About
What this site does
When something happens, many outlets report it, each in its own way. This site gathers every outlet's coverage of the same event on one page, with a short summary of each article and a timeline of what happened.
No labels, no scores
The site never labels, scores or judges an outlet or an article. Every article is shown the same way, in order of time. Comparing the coverage, and deciding what to make of it, is left to you.
How summaries are written
Each summary is written by an AI model from that one article only. It keeps what the article emphasises, names who it quotes and keeps the article's own terms, without correcting, balancing or commenting on it. Summaries are short and in our own words; they point to the original and do not replace it. Headlines are shown exactly as the outlet published them.
How the timeline is built
The timeline tracks what happened in the event, not when articles were published. It is the one place the site speaks in its own voice, so each step is a single short, neutral line, checked against its source articles. Accusations stay attributed until a court has ruled. A date marked "c." is approximate.
Outlets that don't allow AI summaries
Some outlets say their articles may not be read by AI. For those, the site never opens the article and never gives it to a model: it lists only the headline, exactly as published, with a link, the way a search engine would. They are matched to events by the names in their headlines, which is less reliable, so you will see fewer of their articles here than they publish.
Mistakes
An automated system will sometimes group articles wrongly or summarise one badly. If you see an error, please tell us so it can be fixed.